Fighting Hard Against Rape Charges Tulsa Sex Crimes Attorney
This content was written for Cale Law Office
With Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale, you get aggressive representation to fight your rape charge. But isn’t that what you’d want when looking for the best Tulsa sex crimes attorney? For your free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. Attorney Cale has been practicing for 20 years and dedicates his practice to criminal defense. That’s a huge benefit for his clients. Focus and experience matter when your life is on the line. Attorney Stephen Cale fights hard for his clients because he knows that their life, liberty, future, and reputation are at stake.
Serving clients throughout Oklahoma and Northeastern Oklahoma, including Tulsa County, Jenks, Glenpool, Bixby, Collinsville, Owasso, Sand Springs, Sapulpa, Rogers County, Catoosa, Claremore, Mayes County, Adair, Chouteau, Disney, Grand Lake, Langley, Locust Grove, Pensacola, Salina, Spavinaw, Wagoner County, Coweta, Muskogee County, Webbers Falls, Okmulgee County, Pawnee County, Keystone Lake, Osage County, Pawhuska, Hominy, Nowata County, Coffeyville, Craig County, Vinita, Big Cabin, Washington County, Bartlesville, Copan, and Dewey.
Some of the cases that Tulsa sex crimes attorney Stephen Cale handles include, but are not limited to: sexual battery, child molestation, lewd or indecent proposal to a child under 16, lewd acts, indecent exposure, online solicitation, peeping Tom, prostitution, taking clandestine photographs, child sexual abuse, forcible sodomy, enabling child abuse, child neglect, enabling sexual abuse, child endangerment, human trafficking, child stealing, kidnapping, rape, rape by instrumentation, spousal rape, date rape, indecent exposure, procuring lewd exhibition, possession of child pornography, distribution of child pornography, rape by a teacher, and others.
In a case not handled by the Cale Law Office, was convicted of rape by jury. Punishment was assessed by the jury at 50 years in prison. The defendant six reversal based on six grounds of error. First, he contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for rape. Next, he contends that the trial court erred in of rolling his motions for directed verdict. Lastly, he argues that the trial court erred appellant to include the required, mental state to the courts definition of the offenses of rape. Here’s a summary the facts the case.
A conviction for rape carries a heavy penalty that can include prison time. That’s why you need the best Tulsa sex crimes attorney. Tulsa criminal lawyer Stephen Cale understands that your life, liberty, reputation, and future are at stake. For free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. Attorney Stephen Cale will develop a free defense strategy plan document for you. This will outline the steps that he will take in your case. Attorney Stephen Cale is a highly rated and recommended Tulsa sex crimes attorney.
It shows that on January in the early morning hours 19 a woman was returning home from work in a restaurant or she were she was a part-time which is. She North on U. S. Highway 69 were she lived with her parents. While driving on the highway, she noticed a car the shoulder flashing its headlights often on. She turned car around to see if she can help in anyway. She pulled aside the defendant’s vehicle. He told her he was out of gas and asked if she would take him to intelligent get in the car. The woman allowed the defendant to enter car.
The best Tulsa sex crimes attorney will thoroughly cross-examine the prosecution’s witness. This will serve to poke holes in the witnesses testimony. During this will create reasonable doubt. The more reasonable doubt, the more likely to get an acquittal at trial. The defendant gave the winter access to turn down asked our old. She just about five miles in the hallway to the location where the rape occurred.
At this time, the defendant told her to turn into a driveway. The woman did so in the defendant grabbed her car keys from the ignition switch after the struggle, the woman exited the car and attempted to flee. The defendant grabbed her and she can free yourself attempted to reenter the car and lock the defendant out. She failed in this effort. After the defendant reenter the vehicle was a woman, he then reached into the backseat of the car remove some clothing from the cutting her. He bent the coat hanger around place it over the woman said it around her neck.
When you hire the best Tulsa sex crimes attorney, you know that you’re getting somebody who is experienced and dedicated to getting you the best possible result in your case. Attorney Stephen Cale has been practicing for 20 years. He also focuses his practice on criminal defense. He is a highly rated and skilled Tulsa criminal lawyer. Attorney Stephen Cale understands that your life, liberty, reputation, and future are at stake. Give him a call today at 918-277-4800.
The defendant told her to cooperate and that he did not want to her. He disrobed the woman and raped her on the, wrapped around her neck. We, as the rape, the defendant drove the woman and her car to a locked in a nearby city he left the vehicle and released her. She went directly home, informed her parents of the rape and called the police. She then went to the hospital for medical examination. The evidence showed that she did not have any serious bodily injuries during the course of the crime.
If you’ve been charged with a sex crime, it’s important that you hire the best Tulsa sex crimes attorney. You want someone who will seriously care about you and your case. Attorney Stephen Cale has handled numerous sex crimes cases. He will fight hard to get you the best possible result in your case. You can see testimonials from other clients at CaleLawOffice.com.
The trial court conducted a hearing on the admissibility the confession. After the hearing, the trial court found that the confession was voluntary. It heard from the arresting officers and others that participated in the defense arrest. This included transportation officers to the jail. The defendant testified that after his arrest, he was being by to police officers. He did not explain the reason for the beatings. Neither did he testified that the beating was administered by the officers an effort to acquire some to give a statement.