Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Attorney | Worth the Money
This content was written for Cale Law Office
Are you looking for the best criminal defense attorney? Call Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale at 918-277-4800. Schedule your free initial consultation with the Cale law office.
Often times they may be charged with more than one crime. There’s actually the crime of committing more than one crime. It’s called a pattern of criminal offenses. Anyone who engages in a pattern of criminal offenses in two or more counties or who attempts or conspires with others to engage in a pattern of criminal activity is guilty of a misdemeanor. This crime is punishable for up to two years in prison or a fine of up to $25,000. This punishment is in addition to any penalty imposed or any of offense involved in the pattern.
A pattern of criminal offenses means to a more criminal offenses are committed as part of the same plan, scheme, or adventure, said Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale. Can also mean a sequence of two or more of the same criminal offenses that are committed and not separated by an interval of more than 30 days. A sheriff was actually charged with this type of crime.
The sheriff was the sheriff of Custer County. He befriended a drug court participant repeatedly telephoned her. He asked that she travel from Custer County to his hotel room in Oklahoma City. The participant gave in when the defendant demanded she me him or he would vote for her termination from drug court. The defendant provides her alcohol and had sex with her.
While all this was going on, the defendant would intervene in the participant’s urinalysis testing at the jail. The defendant often would intervene in the UA testing and keep jail officials from reporting a positive test. This occurred with other participants as well.
After his conviction, the defendant appealed.
Attempting to escape from prison is a felony. This is true even if the term of imprisonment had already expired at the time of the attempted escape. In 1986, the defendant was tried for attempted escape. The jury convicted him and sentenced him to 18 months.
Prison officials caught the defendant when he is seen lying in the grass between two fence posts. They discovered that he cut holes in both of the chain-link fences. At least one other inmate escape through this hole. The state originally charges the defendant with an attempt to escape. After the preliminary hearing, the state amended the charge to general escape. The judge denied the defendant’s request for second preliminary hearing.
On appeal, the defendant argued that the trial court made a mistake by Bellingham over for trial. He said that the state presented insufficient evidence.
Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale said that the purpose of the preliminary hearing is twofold. The first is to determine whether not a crime was committed. The second is to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence that the defendant committed the crime.
Assisting the escape of prisoner is also a felony. Anyone who willfully assists the prisoner to escape can be punished by up to 10 years in prison. However, if the prisoner was incarcerated on the charge there was a misdemeanor. The punishment is up to one year in jail or $500.
Sending a prisoner anything much useful to the prisoner making escape is also a crime. As a felony punishable by up to 10 years in jail. However, if the person was in jail for a misdemeanor, the punishment is up to one year in jail or $500 fine.
The crime of harboring a fugitive is broad, said Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale. Anyone who knowingly feeds, lodges, clothes, arms, or equips, or harbors, or aids, or conceals an outlaw is guilty of harboring a fugitive. This is punishable by up to 10 years in prison. Additionally, it’s unlawful for any person who is reasonable that the sex offenders in violation of registration requirements to elude arrest. This includes withholding information for failing to notify law enforcement officials about the noncompliance.
Is a crime to falsify exhibits that will be used at court. It’s also a crime to falsify exhibits that may be made part of an investigation. This crime is a misdemeanor.
The defendant was convicted by a jury. The case surrounds a gunfight that occurred one night. The defendants in several other people were home with friends. The friend filed several shots injured another guest. Crime scene revealed a sever different caliber shells were in the living room. At least two different guns have been fired in the house.
Both the defendants testified at the preliminary hearing and a trial that neither of them owned guns. They said another guy did all the shooting. He also denied having guns during the time of the shooting incident. They stated that they did not know how the bullets got into the living room.
There’s also testimony that after the shooting incident, another defendant stated who did all the shooting. After the defendants trial, the DAs office filed charges against them for perjury conspiracy to commit a felony. The defense asserted on the appeal of the state did not meet its burden of proof because the testimony trial is not corroborated by at least one criminal witness.
Relied on a case that states that no one can be convicted of perjury except upon the testimony of two credible witnesses or of one credible witness strongly corroborated by other evidence. However, this ruling was abolished by statute. However, the Oakland Court of Criminal Appeals said that there was sufficient evidence for the conviction.
The law requires a certain degree of proof to find a person guilty of perjury. Proof of can be unoriginal doubt is sufficient for conviction. Also, it’s not necessary that proof is by a certain number of witnesses. Neither is it necessary that proof be by a certain number of the document. Is a defense to perjury the statement is true. Is also a defense that the accused at the time he made the statement believe that the statement was true.