Tulsa Criminal Defense Attorney Wants Justice | Cale Law Office
This content was written for Cale Law Office
If you had to have surgery, would you want something that was fresh out of medical school or an experienced doctor? When it comes to representing you against a criminal charge, you need somebody that has extensive experience. Call Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale at 918-277-4800. Attorney Cale has nearly two decades of experience. He focuses on criminal defense.
Attorney Stephen Cale provides excellent legal representation. His belief is that everybody deserves to have an attorney that will fight hard for him. You can expect excellent representation with Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale. He is extensive courtroom experience. Here’s what happens when a person is arrested. Personal be taken to the local jail. Sometimes this will be a challenge setting or jail the county. Then they will be processed or booked. This includes taking down personal information and getting a photograph taken of you. You’ll be informed of how much Bell is. There is usually a schedule for the bell. That means there’s a list of certain crimes have a predetermined amount of bail. Sometimes a judge will determine the bill amount. You’ll be given an opportunity to make a phone call to have some a posted bond and get out of jail. A bond is, like an insurance policy. You pay a premium or percentage of the actual bail amount. So, for example, with a twenty thousand dollars.
If you posted bail, you will be released. Sometimes release takes a couple of hours. After you’ve been arrested, whether you have posted bill or not, you should call an attorney right away. It’s specially called Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale at 918-277-4800. He will get started your case immediately.
Do not talk to others about the facts of your case. Family members will wonder what happened can simply tell them that you were arrested and you need to talk to an attorney. By talking to an attorney, things he said to him a confidential. The court cannot make you testify are reveal what you’ve told your attorney. It is especially important that you do not talk to police unless you have an attorney present.
Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale maintains that you cannot help yourself by talking to police. It’s important that you first talk to an attorney so that he can evaluate whether not all be helpful for you to talk to law enforcement. While is the job of law enforcement to serve and protect, cops often see the job as to arrest people and throw them in jail. Some police are thugs. They don’t care about us is citizens constitutional rights. All they care about the shown authority because they got picked on at school and inferior. Superior when they have a badge on it again Strout to their waste.
The next step in the legal process is your initial appearance. Sometimes is called an arraignment. At the arraignment, you’ll either plead guilty, innocent or no contest. Typically, a not guilty plea will it be entered for you to preserve your rights. Tulsa criminal defense attorney’s Stephen Cale says that you should never plead guilty or no contest the charge without first consulting an attorney. Attorney Cale can use a strategy to try to get a case dismissed. The case cannot get dismissed, it could be reduced to a lesser charge. Or a client may choose to go to a jury trial. Attorney Stephen Cale has several years of experience with jury trials.
You’ll be tempted to talk to people about your case. However usually talk about the details of the case to your attorney. That’s because what you tell attorney is confidential. The court cannot for Centerville that information.
In one case, the defendant argued on appeal that the doctrine of collateral estoppel apply to your situation. This doctrine stands for the principle that would initiate ultimate fact has once been determined by valid and final judgment, the issue cannot be medicated again between the same parties in any future lawsuit. This rule applies to criminal proceedings and is embodied in the Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy.
An acquittal the criminal charge does not bar relitigation of the cell sit arising from the same set of circumstances in the same parties. However, the converse is not necessarily true. Collateral estoppel may be applicable where the first cause of action was civil the second was criminal the reason this is true is because there is a lower part of proof in a civil proceeding. A specific jury finding on the ultimate issue in favor of the defendant preclude a subsequent criminal prosecution of the same issue or issues. The Oakland Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the applicability of the doctrine of collateral estoppel to criminal proceedings with the prior proceeding was civil in nature.
In order to apply this doctrine, the following elements must be established. The first issue previously decided is identical with the one presume the action in question, meaning the criminal action. To the prior action has been finally adjudicated on the merits. Thirdly, the party can send the doctrine was vote was the party or privity with a party, to the prior determination. Lastly, the party against whom the doctrine is raised a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue prior to the action.
The state of Oklahoma has an interest in protecting fetal survival. When determining the viability of the fees fetus the key issue is when the state alleges a defendant committed the murder of an unborn child. In one case, the court held that an unborn fetus was viable at the time of the entry and is a human being who may be subject of homicide. Viability measures the ability of the fetus to sustain life outside the mother’s womb.
An unborn child shall be presumed to be viable within twenty-four weeks have elapsed from the probable beginning of the last menstrual period the pregnant woman. Before criminal liability for the homicide of fetus can be imposed, the must be showing that the fetus was viable and potentially able to live outside the womb of the mother. This presumption viability being cans with evidence that the fetus had attained and gestational age of twenty-four weeks.