Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Attorney | Top Notch
This content was written for Cale Law Office

If you’re looking for a Tulsa criminal defense attorney, call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800 your initial consultation with attorney Stephen Cale is free. Attorney Cale also develops a free defense strategy plan document for you. This will give you an idea of the legal landscape and what defenses attorney Cale will provide for you.
Because your liberty is at stake, you need aggressive legal representation. Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale has been practicing for nearly two decades. When the things of his clients like about him is that he focuses on criminal defense. This allows clients to have an attorney that has an expertise in the field.
The criminal process starts with an arrest. This can be done by an officer arresting the person if the officer sees a person committing the crime or has probable cause that the person can come. If the officer did not see the crime occurred, the attorney reported district attorney’s office. From there the district attorney will decide whether not to file a charge. If the DA files a charge, a judge will issue a warrant.
After an arrest, to make his first appearance in court. This is called an initial appearance. Sometimes it is called initial arraignment. At this stage the case the court will form the defendant of the charge and automatically enter a not guilty plea. For misdemeanor cases, the next stage is a disposition docket. This is a procedural matter in which the defendant will announce whether not there is going to be a plea or he wants to move on to a trial.
Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale has worked on numerous jury trials. He has handled some of the most serious cases, including murder. Sometimes attorney Cale’s able to get a charge dismissed even before trial. This is just another reason why you want to hire attorney Cale for your case. He provides excellent service to his clients.
When deciding who to hire for your case, there are many choices out there. But there’s really only one right choice. To the right thing for yourself, and call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. Schedule your free initial consultation with attorney Stephen Cale. He provides aggressive legal representation for his clients.
The procedure for a felony case varies slightly than for a misdemeanor case. After the initial arraignment, the next stage is the preliminary hearing. This is like a mini-trial except the judge does not determine guilt or innocence. The purpose of the preliminary hearing is to determine two things. The first determination is whether or not a crime was committed. The second question is whether or not the defendant committed the crime. If the judge Faizabad factors apply, the defendant will be bound over for trial.
However, if the judge determines that the state is not sufficiently proved one or both of those factors, the case will be dismissed. At the conclusion of the preliminary hearing, attorney Stephen Cale always asked for a dismissal. The judge does not dismiss the case at the conclusion of the hearing, attorney Cale will file a formal request for dismissal. This is just one the strategies that he uses to defend his clients. He is an excellent legal researcher.
A jury found the defendant guilty of leaving the scene of an accident that resulted in personal injury. The defendant did this without getting the person is required by law. The judge assessed punishment at 90 days in jail. On appeal, he argued that the judge instructed the jury on a lesser included offense of assault and battery. The gist of his argument was that the sentence was excessive.
A jury convicted the defendant of assault with a dangerous weapon. Here are the general facts. Three boys attacked the victim as he was preparing to leave the trip. A defendant cannot a threat the victim. The victim testified that he believed that the defendant was about to commit him with a knife and jabbed at hand. Further, he testified that he attempted to grab the defendant’s wrists that he hit him in the head with the other hand.
The content of his car from the scene where others joined him. He returned home and notified police. Then he went to the hospital for treatment. Several witnesses testified through some kind of confrontation between the defendant in the victim. He also said that the victim ran into the lake with defendant chasing him.
The defendant testified on his own behalf. Sometimes this is a chance that the client must take, said attorney Stephen Cale. Sometimes it can be risky because the defendant will be subjected to cross-examination by the prosecutor. But, putting on the facts of the case, the defendant may hold himself by testifying. Each case is different and whether a person testifies the question of fact.
The defendant testified that he confronted the victim because it showed a flashlight the car. He was mad and started to hit the victim. The defendant testified that for he could strike the victim, he felt it did not have time to pull a knife. He denied that he threatened to cut them. But, he did say that he chased the victim.
On appeal, the defendant contended that the statute for which he was charged failed to state a crime. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals rejected this argument. It found that the trial court had jurisdiction to enter the judgment that the jury provided. The High Court also said that the improper remarks of the prosecutor did not constitute a substantial violation of constitutional rights. But every improper remark justifies reversal.
Both remarks are such that it cast down as to whether the defendant was prejudiced by the remarks, and that doubt should be resolved in favor the defendant. This is one way to get a person found not guilty and a jury trial. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals modified the sentenced from three years to one year. That sentence was suspended. That means that the defendant will be on probation and not have to go to prison.