This content was written for Cale Law Office
Being charged with a crime can have serious consequences. That’s why you want the best Tulsa criminal defense attorney. Call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800 to schedule your free initial consultation. With your consultation, you also get a free defense strategy plan to take with you.
Defendant was charged with first-degree manslaughter. A jury found him guilty and sentenced him to 30 years in prison. The death occurred as a result of the car collision with the defendant was the driver of one car. He’s being chased by the Tulsa Police Department. Speeds reached more than 100 miles per hour. The state alleged that the death occurred during the commission of a misdemeanor, specifically reckless driving.
On appeal, the defendant argued that the jury instruction on first-degree manslaughter was not appropriate. The appellate court agreed. The court said that the failed to homicide statute superseded manslaughter in the 2nd° in cases where the death was a result of an automobile accident. The court had previously held that intoxicated driver who was involved in an accident can subject himself to first-degree manslaughter. The state argued that reckless driving, which is a misdemeanor, can also subject the driver to first-degree manslaughter.
The state relied on the case that had a similar fact situation. In that case, the driver was charged with a homicide occurred during the commission of a misdemeanor. In the case, the misdemeanor was reckless driving. Statute read that when a death of any person ensues within one year is the approximate result of injury received by driving any vehicle reckless manner, the person so operating the vehicle shall be guilty of negligent homicide.
In this case, the charge alleged homicide commission of reckless driving. That statute defined reckless driving as a person drive a motor vehicle in a careless her want to manner without regard for the safety of the person or property or in violation of certain conditions statutes. Such a pain the parent that the culpability of the driver charged under either negligent homicide or manslaughter and commission of a misdemeanor of reckless driving is the same. Therefore, while might be true that their appearing degrees a recklessness or negligence, it’s also true that the legislature did not distinguish the two, said Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale. A more specific and more recent statute will control cases that deal with fatal accidents arising from the reckless operation of a motor vehicle. Highway safety statutes generally provide that fractions are misdemeanors. Under the statutory scheme of the time, drivers involved in an accident or merely speeding could be charged with first-degree manslaughter because speeding can be reckless driving or it can itself be defined as a misdemeanor.
The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals held that it was improperly charged the defendant with first-degree manslaughter although without the statute the facts proven in the case would justify a conviction on the charge. However, in view the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the court reversed with directions to the trial court to modify the sentence to one year the county jail with credit for time served, said Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale.
In another case the appellate race two separate challenges to the admission of blood test results that indicate that his blood alcohol concentration the night of the offense was above that permitted by law. First the appellate court found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in the blood alcohol test evidence. An arrest is not a prerequisite for the withdrawal blood. In this case, the defendant was driver of the vehicle involved in a fatality accident. He could been cited for a traffic offense at the scene. However he was not and he was placed under arrest.
The defendant was not removed from the scene of the accident to the hospital or other health care facility for he could be arrested. The defendant was the driver the vehicle involved in this tell the accident. The legislature has authorized the board of test for alcohol and drug influenced authorized qualified persons to draw blood for the purposes of having determination made of blood alcohol concentration with the presence of other intoxicating substances. The board attendance has enacted a real concerning who is authorized to throw blood for this purpose
the role provides in part that other persons designated by law or authorized withdrawal blood. The Oklahoma ministry the code is also promulgated in rule that provides an EMT paramedic license with the national registry the state health department are authorized withdrawal blood.
What do preliminary hearing, the defendant Baltimore to the information a motion to quash. The magistrate denied the motion and the defendant was bound over for trial. Later the defendants on the supplement is demurrer must quash. A hearing of the motion was held in the court took the matter under advisement. My written order, the judge stated the motion to quash.
Stapleton notice of intent to appeal. The state sole argument on appeal was that the district court abused its discretion in granting the defendant’s motion to quash insufficient evidence. The appellate court you the trial court’s ruling to determine if it was clearly erroneous. The defendant was charged with first-degree manslaughter in connection with a traffic accident Muskogee County. Is not disputed that a vehicle driven by the defendant collided with an oncoming vehicle on state highway will defendant was attempting to pass other vehicles in a marked the passing zone. One person died in the crash. Anyone charged with the death of another person needs the best Tulsa criminal defense attorney.
At the time the case Oklahoma’s first-degree manslaughter statute and not been unchanged since statehood. It punishes among other things in the homicide perpetrated without a design to affect death by person case the commission of a misdemeanor. The negligent homicide statute, which was enacted in 1961, punishes the death of any person which is the proximate result of injury received by driving of any vehicle by any person the reckless disregard of the safety of others, when death occurs within one year of injury, said Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale.