Tulsa Criminal Defense Attorney | Narcotics Lawyer | Cale Law Office
This content was written for Cale Law Office

Are you looking for a Tulsa criminal defense attorney? For aggressive legal representation, call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. Your initial consultation with attorney Stephen Cale is free. Attorney Cale has nearly two decades of experience. He focuses his practice on criminal defense.

Prosecutors charged the defendant with larceny of controlled drugs. The jury found him guilty and sentenced him to 50 years in prison. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction and sentence back for new trial. Here the facts of the case. The unoriginal store closes his operation close to evening. We came back to the store the next day, he noticed a whole a roof. Police determined that various drugs were missing. Also missing from the drugstore was set of scales used to measure out medicine.

A couple days later, the defendant visited the home of a woman and her daughter early the morning. They had a plastic bag a small suitcase caring various drugs. The defendant’s also had scales on a pocket calculator. These drugs were the same type as those missing from the drugstore. The defendant told him that he does friends tell the drugs in the drugstore. They asked her to help him sell the drugs. The woman refused and the defendant left.

About a week later, the daughter went to a motel with the defendant. They used a physicians desk reference to identify various drugs. They went to the location where those drugs were hidden. Police choose one recovered the drugs and introduced amended evidence at trial. Authorities later arrested the defendant. Following his conviction, he appealed.

Sometimes crimes can be prosecuted in a city or municipal court’s. These types of courts are limited to criminal and traffic proceedings rising out of city ordinances. There are two types immiscible courts in Oklahoma. The first is a Municipal Court that is not of record. A municipal court that is not of record will have jurisdiction to hear prosecutions of an ordinance where the court established. The second Thompson Municipal Court of record. They have the same kind jurisdiction. Some courts have jurisdiction over certain juvenile proceedings.

Prosecutors charged the defendant with conspiracy to distribute a controlled dangerous substance. The jury found him guilty and sentenced him to five years in prison. He appealed from this decision. Here’s a summary the facts of the case. Two detectives met with two guys to buy cocaine as part of an undercover narcotics investigation. Quantitative arranged to buy half an ounce of cocaine. They initially met an apartment complex on the south side of Tulsa. Two men urged the detectives to give the money and what it apartment for them to return the cocaine.

The detectives fear that the two might still the money. So the refuse the request and found the men to another part of town. The undercover officers then agreed to wait in the parking lot on the man returned with the drugs. Arriving at the parking lot shortly before the stores closing time, the detective stories the people the store looking at the windows of the two cars a lot. Because the two men were nervous, the detectives gave them in the money and agree to wait for them in another restaurant across the street.

Originally, the sting operation was to allow the two men to leave without arrest after the buy. The serial numbers of money used in the transaction were not recorded. However, dollars choose to purchase the drug consisted of 12 new $100 bills, folded over twice, with thousand dollar bundles stapled and one end the paper clipped together. The detective gave the man the money, he was to return with half an ounce of cocaine. The two men later returned with a baggie containing a white powdery substance. Tests confirmed that this was cocaine.

Police were moderating the two men decided to arrest them. The police searched them, they did not find a $1200. One man agrees to cooperate with the officers and named somebody’s an individual for whom he had obtained cocaine. This may provide directions to the man’s house. The officers obtained a search warrant for the residence and executed immediately. Finding the subject at home, the officer search the house in question him about the two men.

The occupant them admitted that the two men had earlier obtained cocaine from him. Lisa the defendant supplied them with the cocaine. This man told officers that the defendant had delivered the cocaine earlier the evening in return later to pick up the money. Give the officers a description of the defendant in the car he was driving. He also told them possible locations where he can be found at night. The detective radioed the information to the officer in both officers proceeded to search for the defendant.

Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale said they should never talk to police. If you do want to talk to police, the way to the attorney present with you. If you try to get a better deal, wait until you have an agreement with the District Attorney’s Office before talking with police. And again, always have a lawyer with you.

Police by the defense, the parking lot of the club. They followed the defendant until another officer arrived. The defendant left the club for a nearby restaurant. The detective detained the defendant. Police arrested him for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Police found a small bottle containing a white powder from his pocket the money, including the $12 used to buy the cocaine earlier. Police also found a pistol in the glove compartment they also found scales and more cocaine in the trunk of the defendant’s car.

The defendant contended on appeal that the information was fatally defective as it failed to set forth elements of the crime charged. Objection to the sufficiency of an information cannot be raised for the first on appeal less some foundation was laid for the objects before the final judgment was rendered. Generally, when a defendant pleads to the information proceeds trial, he waived his right to attack the sufficiency of information on appeal. If you’ve been charged with a drug crime, call Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale at 918-277-4800.