Best Tulsa Criminal Defense Attorney | First-Rate
This content was written for Cale Law Office

Are you looking for a Tulsa criminal defense attorney? Make sure that you contact Stephen Cale Cale law office. Go to or call 918-277-4800 to schedule your free initial consultation. Attorney Cale also provides you with a free defense strategy plan document. Attorney Cale has nearly two decades of experience and focuses his practice on criminal defense.
Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale will look for the best possible outcome for you. He’s been able to get cases dismissed. Sometimes a client will have what’s called an affirmative defense. An example of this is self-defense. Sometimes, people are charged with a crime even when they’ve been defending themselves against an attack.
A jury convicted the defendant of murder and assault battery with a deadly weapon. The defendant when it to the home of one of his brothers. There, he and some others were watching a football game. The defendant wanted others to go with him while he went to find his brother. The defendant feared reprisal by a has been because he was having a fair with the man’s wife.
Another kindness and try to clean store to get some items. On the way back home, the past car at the intersection. When the passengers the car yelled something at the driver. He turned the car around and pulled up behind the person was yelling at him. Then, the car stopped in front of the truck.
According to the victim, he had another person, the truck. The witness would render the back of the truck and come up behind another guy. The doors to the car and ran towards it. The guy hit another the face in a two-story to Russell around a ditch. Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale will look for any defense possible. This includes self-defense or defense of others.
If you’ve been charged with a crime, you need serious legal representation. Call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. You need a high-caliber attorney like attorney Cale. During a fight, the witness looks to see someone with a club. He felt a couple blows to his head. After several hours of fighting, the witness was able to break free make his way to his friend but did not remember seeing anything else or the rest of fight.
The defendant stabbed the victim several times. He and the victims content car and went to the hospital. Next, the defendant fled to another state.
The defendant asserted that the court denied his due process when he was convicted of a greater offense than that for which was bound over for preliminary hearing. He maintained that he was bound over the charge of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon. But the state tried him and convicted him of the greater crime of assault and battery with data deadly weapon. The defendant never objected on these grounds.
The record showed that the defendant originally was charged with assault battery with a data deadly weapon. At the beginning of the preliminary hearing, the judge announced that his defense was charged with first-degree murder and assault battery with a deadly weapon. The district attorney confirmed this. At the end of the preliminary hearing, the judge reviewed the evidence and found that the defendant should be bound over also assault and battery with a deadly weapon.
However, the record contained a misstatement. The defendant with had his day in court and had the process it was due to him. Before the hearing, the defendant contended that. This is because the judge addition to search warrants of arrest warrants in the case. He asserted that because the judge must have lesser without probable cause and order is the warrants, the judge of was unfairly predisposed to find public cause a preliminary hearing. The defendant claimed that this error required for relief and asked court reversed conviction remember case for proper preliminary hearing.
Every person is entitled to have an impartial judge presided over the case. The judge who is interested in the cause proceedings or the result of the case is qualified to preside. The release of motions to disqualify her within the sound discretion the district courts. They are reversed only when there’s been a clear abuse of discretion. An abuse of discretion has occurred where the trial judge’s actions showed actual prejudice against the accused of the judge became intertwined the case to personal relationships.
The present case, the defendant’s brief did not reveal any instances of prejudiced by the judge toward the defendant. It also did not show how the judge became intertwined in the case to do some personal relationship with one the parties. However, the defendant argues that the appellate court to accept the argument that if the judge signs a search warrant, then the judge is necessarily biased in the subsequent preliminary hearing. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has consistently allowed the judge or issues a consent citation to preside over the contempt hearing. The act of signing a search warrant to arrest warrant does not constitute a type of interest of the proceeding that would automatically prohibit a judge from presiding the subsequent preliminary hearing, said Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale.
The purpose of jury selection is to ascertain whether there are grounds to challenge prospective jurors for cause and to permit the intelligent use of peremptory challenges. The manner extent of questioning is within the discretion the trial court. The trial court can restrict questions that are repetitive or are in regard to legal issues. This is on to try to find an impartial jury.