This content was written for Cale Law Office

Hire an aggressive Tulsa criminal defense attorney who likes to fight for his clients. Call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800 schedule your free initial consultation. With your consultation, you get a free defense strategy plan to take with you.
A law enforcement officer acting outside his or her jurisdictions a private citizen. As such, it may make a citizens arrest. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has clarified its decisions regarding an officer acting outside his jurisdiction. The court the previous case to not directly address the manner in which an officer XQ the truck stop. However, it said that simplicity affects the case of the officer was acting kind of law week conduct and stop. This guy should have hired the best Tulsa criminal defense atorney.
For public safety reasons, the action was necessary to stop and protect both the defendant and other drivers of the roadway. The imminent need to save human life should forgive or delay strict compliance with Miranda rights. A warrantless entry may be justified by the media need to protect preserve life or avoid serious injury. The police officer acting outside his jurisdiction have a duty to stop and arrest suspected drunk driver. Court previously recognized the public safety exception to the general rule that an officer asked the acting outside his or her jurisdiction is a premises and may not act under color of law. Example of exceptions to the general the place officer’s authority to Noxon fields jurisdiction or merely illustrations of exceptions and do not limit a police officer in operating inside his or her jurisdiction were otherwise authorized by statute.
Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale said that the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has outlined narrow exceptions to the law that requires an officer to act within his jurisdiction. These four factors are: 1) the urgency of the situation and that no other course of action promises the relief needed:2; 3) the primary motivation of the officer involved is protect the safety of the public, suspect or the officer from immediate danger: and 4) whether the officer’s use of the color of law was minimal and limited to the means necessary to secure the welfare of himself or others. There are examples where an officer’s general query was aimed at seven girls life, not calculated to build a case against the defendant. Another example police limited to questions to the location of a child the primary purpose of the questions be the rescue the child not to investigate a crime. Lastly, officers had admissible grounds to believe that there was an immediate need to protect others from entering to the house was brief to secure the safety of potential occupants.
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals found that the facts are fit within the public safety exception is. As the trial court determined that defendant’s gross neck legends created an urgent situation danger the safety of the defendant another citizen of where the time. Tulsa officer acted in a reasonable belief that there could be available to wait for the broken arrow police officer arrived. Does the officer’s primary purpose motivation for the stop of unit of his lights and sirens was to secure the safety of the defendant others.
Isn’t it obvious that you should hire the best Tulsa criminal defense attorney? No other course of action assert his abilities swiftly stopped a defendant neutralized the situation. Once the defendant stopped, Tulsa officer’s actions comported with the law that provides a private person who is arrest another for the commission of a public offense, must, without an assailant delay, taken before a magistrate or deliver him to a peace officer. Because the Tulsa officer order previously alerted the Provera Police Department, a Tulsa officer simply detained the defendant the way to the arrival at law enforcement so they can take the matter over conduct discussion.
The appellate court said that justice would not be served by the application of the exclusionary rule and circumstances of this case. The prime purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter future unlawful conduct of police and thereby picks where the guarantee of the fourth amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures. Assuming for argument sake to the evidence obtained here was the product of an illegal search, the evidence was not coming by the exportation of the illegality but instead by means officially distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint. The officer’s motivation. The defendant in a manner which he did was to remove her from the roadway to prevent a terrible accident. Having just completed the ship the ulcer simply want to go home at night. His intent was never to arrest the defendant to gather evidence against her. Once the defendant was stopped, the Tulsa officer detained her in a way the rival of local police. Moreover, his prior dispatched with Provera Police Department assured their intervention. Tulsa officer intent to follow defendant until such intervention occurred. Therefore, discovery of the suppressed evidence by lawful means was inevitable.
The defendant was convicted of larceny of gasoline and sentenced to one year in jail and finds $7500. A place officer may retain security check at the truck stop. He saw only one car parked in the parking lot which was a tractor and a moving van. The officer Miller that a similar type of vehicle was involved in gasoline thefts from a local truck stop. See the moving van parked directly over gasoline storage tanks, the officer drove slowly past the trailer and smelled the odor of gasoline.
Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale likes fighting for his clients. The officer then drove to point out a cited radio the shares deputies. He next turned up a slight center of to an interstate of a pass in part where he can see the parking lot. Deputies said the two men appeared that they were leaving the truck stop. The officer asked the deputy subjects see if the storage tanks were still locked. The officer saw that the locks were missing. The officer pursued the vehicle to stop and hold occupants until Debbie’s could arrive. The officer stopped the vehicle on interstate wall still think a County and arrested the defendant.