This content is written for Cale law office.
Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale discusses the crime of being an accessory. For a free initial consultation, call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. You’ll also get a complimentary criminal defense strategy plan.
No one can be convicted of been accessory to a felony unless state proves beyond a reasonable doubt certain elements of the crime that accessory. The first element is that a person must actively conceal or aid the offender. Secondly this aid or concealment must be after the commission of the felony charged. Thirdly, the concealing or aiding must be performed with the knowledge that the offender committed the acts which constitute the felony charged. Lastly, concealing or aiding must be performed with the intent that the offender avoids arrest, trial, conviction, or punishment.
There are several definitions surrounding the crime that accessory. The word aid means to render overt personal assistance. Conceal means to hide or secrete to prevent discovery. Knowledge means personal awareness of the facts.
Concerning the offense of accessory to a felony, this offense is not a lesser included offense of the principal crime. An individual becomes an accessory under only when the individual becomes associated with the offender and his fate subsequent to the commission of the original offense. A person who participates either prior to or during the commission of the offense is liable as a principal. Since the prior commission of a felony by the offender who is aided or concealed is an element of the crime of being accessory, and instruction concerning the elements of the underlying felony must be given in every case.
Everyone concerned in the commission of the crime is regarded under the law is a principle, and as such, are equally guilty. A person related to the commission of the crime Lee and actively commits the crime. The principal also someone who knowingly and with criminal intent aims and abets in the commission of the crime. Further a person can be a principal in a crime by advising and encouraging the commission of the offense regardless of whether or not that person was present.
Merely standing by, even with knowledge concerning the commission of the crime, does not make a person a principal to the crime. Additionally, their presence at the scene of a crime, without participation does not make a person a principal to the crime. Someone who does not actively commit the offense, but instead aids, promotes, or encourages the commission of the crime is deemed to be a principal to the crime if he knowingly did what he did with criminal intent with knowledge of the other persons intent. In order to aid or abet another in the commission of a crime there is an implication of a guilty conscious in instigating, encouraging, promoting, or aiding in that crime.
And eight are in a better doesn’t have to be personally intentional to commit the crime to be libels a principal. A person can be libels a principal for aiding and abetting the perpetrator knowing that the perpetrators intent is to commit the crime. The Court of Criminal Appeals has explained that restricting a person’s liability intent to commit a crime when eliminate aiders because a person who intend to commit the crime would be libels a perpetrator principal. Consider hiring the best Tulsa criminal defense attorney.
Whether or not there was participation in a crime is a question of fact for the jury to determine, said Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale. It can be established by circumstantial evidence. It’s important to note however, that more than consent to the criminal acts of another is required to constitute dissipation. Consent must involve mental activity which does not serve to aid and abet a person the commission of the crime.
There is a defense to aiding and abetting. A person abandons the commission of the crime has such a defense. The responsibility of one who aims and abets in the commission of a crime does not stop unless, within the time to prevent the commission of the crime, that person is done everything practicable to prevent the crime from happening. It’s not enough they he has changed his mind and tried to late to avoid responsibility. That person will still be liable if he fails within the time to let the other person know of his withdrawal. Further, unless that person does everything in his power to prevent the commission of the crime, he will still be considered in aider and a better. In other words, takes more than a change of mind to have this defense.
When a defendant raises abandonment as a defense, then is the burden of the state to prove beyond a respond out the defendant did not abandon his commission the crime. If a jury finds that the state has failed to sustain that burden, then it must find the defendant not guilty. Criminal intent means designed to commit a crime or to commit acts for which the probable consequences or criminal, said Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale.
There are no jury instructions concerning the defendant’s burden to come forward with evidence. Neither is there instruction on the question of whether the defendant has presented sufficient evidence to warrant an instruction. This is because these matters pertain to questions of law and trial procedure. Therefore the scope is beyond the concern of the jury and is instead up to the judge.
The crime of attempt is similar to aiding and abetting. However, it is distinct in that it has different elements. First the defendant must form the specific intent to commit a crime. Secondly, the defendant must have performed some kind of act in the furtherance of the crime. Alternatively, the defendant must’ve purposely engaged in conduct which it would have constituted a crime if the circumstances were such as the defendant believed to be. A perpetrating act is one that would and in the commission of the crime that a defendant intended to commit had it not been for the intervention of circumstances separate of the will of the defendant. The requirement of the defendant commit a perpetrating act must be distinguished from mere preparation to commit a crime. Preparation consists of devising or arranging the means or measures necessary for the commission of a crime.