Tulsa Criminal Defense Attorney | Aggressive Murder Defense | Cale Law Office
This content was written for Cale Law Office

If you’re looking for the best Tulsa criminal defense attorney, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. Schedule your free initial consultation with attorney Stephen Cale. Attorney Cale will also develop a free defense strategy plan document custom-made for your case. Attorney Cale focuses on criminal defense.

In one case, the defendant was charged with trafficking in illegal drugs. At the conclusion of the state’s evidence, the judge raised the question of law and suppress the evidence and dismissed the case. The state appealed on a question of law. The state raised two issues. First question was whether the alert to drug-detecting dog gives an officer probable cause to search the vehicle stop for traffic violation without a search warrant. The second issue was whether the officer has probable cause to search a vehicle stop for traffic violation is required to obtain a search warrant to search the vehicle.

The first is the reason the trial court’s decision is whether the officer’s observations of the defendant and the driver gave him reasonable suspicion to further detain them for investigation. The officer may prolonged detention after traffic stop at the officer has an objectively reasonable and articulable suspicion that illegal activity may be occurring. Bases for the suspicion may include inconsistent statements about destination, in question will proof of ownership or authority to operate the vehicle. These factors were present in this case.

Next, the appellate court determined whether the dog sniff itself constitutes a search. It does not. The dog sniff did not significantly lengthen the time of the skin and attention because the dog was on the scene in the officer’s car. The last issue raised by the trial court’s decision is whether the dog sniff hit rates probable cause to search the without a warrant. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals concluded that it does.

In another case, the defendant was charged with five counts of murder in the first degree. The jury sentenced him to death. He appealed. Here’s a summary the facts of the case. Someone discovered the bodies of five women in a small bedroom and crack house. Each one was gagging had been stabbed several times. The bodies were nude and the others were bound. The room was in disarray in the victim’s persons appear to have answers. There were no drugs or money the house.

Although there were five victims in a confined space, the evidence is just one person committing the crimes. The women were killed in the pattern. A troll blood drops led to the front door. Liminal testing showed a single set of play footprints also leading from the bedroom to the front door. There’s a great deal of victim’s blood in the bedroom. However, the blood trail the door and spell a blood drops found. Places the bedroom not come from the victims.

About a palm print was on the west wall the bedroom closet. Police found the blood a spot with the name embossed on the sole. Despite investigation, police found the one matched either the palm print with a blood drops. Three years later, the samples of the blood drops were submitted for DNA testing. Those results were distributed nationally the following year. Two years later, Nevada authorities informed Oklahoma and they had a person with a DNA profile. Better test confirmed that the blood trail, drops the veteran, and play palm print all belong to the defendant. DNA from semen found in the mouth on the women also was consistent with the defendant’s DNA.

If you’ve been charged with a crime, you need an aggressive lawyer who will work to get the evidence thrown out. Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale focuses on criminal defense. He is handled numerous jury trials. Often times he’ll get a case dismissed before communicated a jury trial. His high rankings in Google from his clients.

The defendant that he was at the house. He testified he went there during the evening in some time close to midnight years there smoking crack with all the victims. He said he only knew the women were in the house. He cannot remember their names. He said he and regular sex with one woman and oral sex with other. During the night there and out of crack and defendant or to the women three dollars to buy some more.

The defendant claimed on appeal that he was denied his right to a jury composed of a fair cross-section of the community through underrepresentation of plaques with jury panel. And the jury pool of 65 persons for five or black. Defense counsel objected to the racial makeup of the jury pull continue to object to the racial makeup of the panel throughout the case. The attorney made an oral motion to quash the panel the end of the first day voir dire.

In order to prove the defendant did not have a fair cross-section of the jury, he must show three things, said Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale. First, the showed that the excluded group is distinctive in the community. Secondly, the defendant show that the groups representation the jury pulls not fair and reasonable in relation to the number people in community. Lastly, the defendant show underrepresentation is due to systematic exclusion in a jury selection process.

The Oklahoma court criminal appeals is found that the Oklahoma jury selection method does not per se systematically excluded Blacks. The defendant also argued that the evidence was insufficient convicted of first-degree murder. The prosecution’s case contains strong circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence must exclude every reasonable hypothesis other than guilt. The appellate court will accept all reasonable inferences and credibility choices which tend to support the jury’s verdict. Together, the evidence presented at trial merits the standard.

If you’ve been charged with a serious crime, you need to call Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale at 918-277-4800. He is an aggressive criminal defense lawyer. He has nearly 20 years of experience and focuses his practice on criminal defense. He is well worth the money.