Experienced Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa Strategies
This content was written for Cale Law Office

With the Cale Law Office, you get aggressive representation to fight your charge. But isn’t that what you’d expect when looking for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer? For your free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. Attorney Stephen Cale has been practicing for 20 years and dedicates his practice to criminal defense. That’s a huge benefit for his clients. Focus and experience matter when your life is on the line. Attorney Stephen Cale fights hard for his clients because he knows that their life, liberty, future, and reputation are at stake.

Serving clients throughout Oklahoma and Northeastern Oklahoma, including Tulsa County, Jenks, Glenpool, Bixby, Collinsville, Owasso, Sand Springs, Sapulpa, Rogers County, Catoosa, Claremore, Mayes County, Adair, Chouteau, Disney, Grand Lake, Langley, Locust Grove, Pensacola, Salina, Spavinaw, Wagoner County, Coweta, Muskogee County, Webbers Falls, Okmulgee County, Pawnee County, Keystone Lake, Osage County, Pawhuska, Hominy, Nowata County, Coffeyville, Craig County, Vinita, Big Cabin, Washington County, Bartlesville, Copan, and Dewey.

A judge convicted the defendant possession of marijuana and unlawfully caring a weapon, that being the client. The court sentenced him to hundred 80 days in jail for each offense. The trial court order the senses to run concurrently. The defendant appealed. Here’s a summary the facts the case. Family driving a single Pickup when officers pulled him over for a defective license plate light. The officer discovered that the defendant had an outstanding warrant.

So, the officers arrested him for the outstanding warrant. During the search the pickup, the officer discovered a marijuana cigarette in the center console next to the driver seat. Another officer discovered a joint behind the driver’s seat. They also found a club behind the driver seat. In reviewing the legal sufficiency of the evidence, the court looks at all the evidence in light most verbal to the verdict. This is to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the fence on a reasonable doubt. The factual sufficiency of the evidence standard of review was restated by the court criminal appeals. The evidence is viewed in a neutral line. On one questions be answered. That is whether or not there is not the evidence for jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. You need to hire the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.

There are number of factors to consider in looking at whether not there is insufficient evidence. When the things to look at his whether the evidence supports avert is so weak that the verdict seems clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. When the supporting evidence is outweighed by the great weight and contrary surrendering the verdict clearly wrong and just. The appeals court must first be able to say that the great weight of the evidence contradicts the jury verdict. There’s a high-level skepticism about the jury’s verdict require before reversal can occur.

The first two issues, the defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for possession of marijuana. He argues that the evidence was legally sufficient because there’s no evidence that he had possession of marijuana. Test me was a specific are conclusive as to who on the vehicle. Neither wasn’t clear who have been driving vehicle or any other indication actual possession of marijuana. He argues that the evidence is insufficient because he offer contrary evidence to when the marijuana was left in the vehicle.

The defendant was the sole occupant the skullcap pickup. He is seen in the video showing to the jury getting on the driver side the pickup. Further, video, when the officer stated that the pickup came back to the defendant. At trial, the defendant referred to as pickup as his truck. One of marijuana and roaches was found in a circle. That would’ve been within the meaning access of the dryer.

If you’re facing marijuana or other drug charges, you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. Dinner marijuana joint was found on the floorboard beyond the driver seat. The defendant explained that there was marijuana and left over from his arrest time it’s really her. He thought he had been cleaner doubt of his pickup. Officer who arrested him also arrested the defendant previously for the same offense. The defendant was in its a pickup for the previous offense. The officer testified that the marijuana pickup was removed was not returned to him.

The ulcer also testified that he believed the entire pickup had been search. This review the evidence in light most verbal to the verdict, a jury found Anderson was in possession of marijuana beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the evidence is legally sufficient. Further, the jury was not required to credit the fence exclamation for white the marijuana was in the pickup. Considering all the evidence in the July, the jury was rationally justified in finding guilt be unoriginal doubt. Accordingly, the evidence is factually sufficient. The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer will tell you to never consent to search of your vehicle.

What appears to be a red shop tell them black political day. The tell peers to extend about seven inches from the end of the sawed-off been. Davis completely wrapped around the towel and extends other instead of the instrument. The sawed-off and is not tape or covered. Instead it is expose. There are no scuff marks on the rounded end of the instrument. It look to the officer like it was a broomstick that a lexical tape wrapped around the handle to use when swinging. The estimate was admitted in evidence. As a heavy wood piece, an inch in diameter and three feet long. As around the top of one and has been sawed-off of the other in.

Defendant did not tell the officer they use this to his walking stick. He used it to ward off the dogs. At trial, he explained that in a medical condition and they use the instrument to ward off dogs. It does not look like a walking stick to the officer. If you’ve been charged with domestic abuse assault battery, you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. For free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800.

The defendant asserts that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support a conviction of unlawfully caring a weapon. Specifically, he contends that there’s no evidence that has been found that the definition of the club. That’s because he stated that he used it is a walking stick and were not dogs. The defendant contends the evidence especially insufficient because his explanation of the use of instrument outweighs all evidence of guilt. The club is defined as his with this special design, made, or debit for the purpose of inflicting seriously only injury. It can be done by striking the person with the instrument. The arresting officer described the incident as a wooden club, possibly three feet long was a black logical tape around the handle area. He found it around the back seat of the pickup. Get the help you need by searching for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.

Some of the cases that Tulsa sex crimes attorney Stephen Cale handles include, but are not limited to: sexual battery, child molestation, lewd or indecent proposal to a child under 16, lewd acts, indecent exposure, online solicitation, peeping Tom, prostitution, taking clandestine photographs, child sexual abuse, forcible sodomy, enabling child abuse, child neglect, enabling sexual abuse, child endangerment, human trafficking, child stealing, kidnapping, rape, rape by instrumentation, spousal rape, date rape, indecent exposure, procuring lewd exhibition, possession of child pornography, distribution of child pornography, rape by a teacher, and others.