Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa Focused on Client Needs
This content was written for Cale Law Office

Are you looking for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer? For a free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. Speak with attorney Stephen Cale. Attorney Cale has been practicing for 20 years. He is a skilled and experienced Tulsa criminal defense lawyer. He understands that your life, liberty, reputation, and future are at stake.

Serving clients throughout Oklahoma and Northeastern Oklahoma, including Tulsa County, Jenks, Glenpool, Bixby, Collinsville, Owasso, Sand Springs, Sapulpa, Rogers County, Catoosa, Claremore, Mayes County, Adair, Chouteau, Disney, Grand Lake, Langley, Locust Grove, Pensacola, Salina, Spavinaw, Wagoner County, Coweta, Muskogee County, Webbers Falls, Okmulgee County, Pawnee County, Keystone Lake, Osage County, Pawhuska, Hominy, Nowata County, Coffeyville, Craig County, Vinita, Big Cabin, Washington County, Bartlesville, Copan, and Dewey.

The defendant stated that he regularly uses marijuana to help with his lower back pain into sleep. He explained that his attorney had asked him to take photographs of all the upstairs rooms the doors to the house. He also stated that he had taken At 5:45 AM, the morning of this testimony, in the upstairs the Outlook the same on the day of trial. The prosecution requested a sidebar, and during the best conference, the defense counsel explained that he intended to reduce the photographs of evidence rebutting the ages testimony. In a case like this, you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.

AJ previously testified that the door to the room at issue was padlock. The prosecution asserted that the evidence should be excluded because the defendant not complied with criminal procedure rules. The district court exclude the photographs, stating that photographs were necessarily probative, were new, because they were only taken a few hours before. The court also said that the it did not see how the photographs would pay the jury. The district court did, however, allow the defendant to preserve the issue for appeal. Afterwards, defendant again testify that the bedroom door was never padlock.

At the close of the evidence in the case, the defendant did not seek to renew his motion for judgment of acquittal. This is something that the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer would do. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty is to count wanted to, but found the defendant guilty on count three. The defendant was sentenced to three years probation. This appeal followed. The defendant asserts that his motion for judgment for acquittal should been sustained. He said there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction because he is a lawful user marijuana. Given they possessed a medical marijuana card at the execution of the search warrant, he should not have been convicted.

There was no evidence offered a trial supporting the insertion that he was addicted to marijuana. The defendant did not rent his motion for judgment of acquittal the clothes evidence. This was necessary to preserve his motion for appeal, this court was there for review the discourse about the motion for manifest miscarriage of justice. This only exists if the record is devoid of any evidence pointed guilt. The law prohibits a person who is an unlawful user for directed to a controlled substance from possessing any firearm or ammunition. It also prohibits him from receiving a any firearm or or ammunition which Ms. shipped or transport ported in interstate or foreign commerce.

To prevent violation, the prosecution must establish that the defendant was engaged in a pattern of regular repeated use of a controlled substance. During a period that recently covers the time it firearm was possess. Defendant claims that the government did not present sufficient evidence that he was unlawful use of a controlled substance. The Court of Appeals disagreed. The defense conviction for violating the state statute is a result of being unlawful use of a controlled substance is not devoid of evidence. If you’re facing charges related to medical marijuana, look for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.

For free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. The defendant search the federal statute prohibiting unlawful person in possession firm does not applied to someone who has a medical marijuana card. The defendant’s assertion is contrary to federal law. That’s because marijuana is a schedule one controlled substance, that means his force Congress is concerned, marijuana has no currently acceptable medical use and treatment. Also there’s a lack of accepted safety for the use of marijuana under medical supervision.

When court rejected the place assertion that because a medical recommendation must be be obtained to receive a marijuana card, the cardholder is not use a controlled substance in a manner outlawed. The doctor cannot legally prescribed marijuana as a matter federal law. No user medical marijuana is using it as a lawful user has prescribed by a licensed physician. Additionally, the ATF issued an open letter to all federal firearms licensee. It’s in this kind of case that you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.

The letter stating that any person who uses or send it to marijuana is prohibited by federal law from possessing firearms or ammunition. This included people who have a state issued medical marijuana license. While interpretive rules to not had to the substantive law that Artie exists in the form of the statute. The Supreme Court is describe interpretive rules this materials issued by an agency to advise the public the agency’s construction statutes and rules which administers. Therefore, was against this predatory and statutory context of the defendant received his medical marijuana card. Consequently, he was on notice of the fact that it was unlawful for him to possess a firearm.

Both parties stipulated that the firm charged in the indictment travel interstate commerce. Further, recording was played at trial, was the defendant stated that the officers would find a loaded firearm in his bedroom. He also testified to smoking marijuana out of record basis. For these reasons, Court of Appeals held that there’s no evidence in the record that the defendant engaged repeated use of marijuana. Additionally, there is evidence that the pattern of use occurred during the period in which he possessed a firearm. Therefore, the district court did not create a manifest miscarriage of justice by denying the defense motion for judgment of acquittal.

The defendant next argued that the photographs the bedroom doors should been allowed into evidence. This is what the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer would argue. The articles were taken on the morning of the defense testimony and were relevant as to whether the defendant in fact possess the bar. The defendant contends that the photographs were crucial discrediting the two agents. Those ages testified on behalf of the prosecution. The state that there was padlock on the bedroom door at issue.