Your Best Interest In Mind Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa
This content was written for Cale Law Office

Are you looking for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer? For a free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. Attorney Stephen Cale has been practicing for 20 years. He dedicates his practice to criminal defense that means he’s the right attorney for your case. Attorney Cale will develop a free defense strategy plan document for you.

Serving clients throughout Oklahoma and Northeastern Oklahoma, including Tulsa County, Jenks, Glenpool, Bixby, Collinsville, Owasso, Sand Springs, Sapulpa, Rogers County, Catoosa, Claremore, Mayes County, Adair, Chouteau, Disney, Grand Lake, Langley, Locust Grove, Pensacola, Salina, Spavinaw, Wagoner County, Coweta, Muskogee County, Webbers Falls, Okmulgee County, Pawnee County, Keystone Lake, Osage County, Pawhuska, Hominy, Nowata County, Coffeyville, Craig County, Vinita, Big Cabin, Washington County, Bartlesville, Copan, and Dewey.

The defendant appeals from the trial court’s dedication of her guilt on the offense of possession of marijuana. The resulting sentence was 12 years in prison. Defense attorney file a brief compliance with a certain case. Here’s a summary of the facts. In March, the defendant pleaded guilty to the offense of possession of marijuana. If you’ve been charged with a drug crime, you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.

The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed the defendant on probation. The fence probation was condition upon her compliance with specific terms and conditions. In February 2010, the state filed a motion to revoke the suspended sentence. The defendant stipulates all the one the allegations. The state waived the allegation to which the defendant stipulated.

Have you been charged with domestic abuse assault battery? Then you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. The record also contains talk misled by the defendant. This includes is to place of the evidence revocation from probation. The defendant testified, denying knowledge of the pages and occur contain marijuana. She also denied attempted to explain your failures comply with the conditions her committee supervision.

Stay present testimony from the defendants based officer. She testified that the defense find a report, make require parents, and conduct job searches violated the terms of her probation. The trial court, based on the defendants stipulation in the evidence presented, revoked her probation. The trial court assessed punishment at 12 years in prison. This appeal followed.

In another case, prosecutors charged the defendant with felony possession of marijuana. Law enforcement found several pounds of marijuana in his residence when the executed a search warrant. The defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence. He maintained that marijuana tape pursuant to the search warrant was illegally seized. If you believe that law enforcement has violated your fourth amendment rights, contact the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has offer.

After hearing, the trial court denied the defense motion. Thereafter, and a bench trial, the defendant pleaded guilty to the charge was placed on 10 years probation. The defendant does not complain of sufficiency of evidence. Instead, he complaints of the trial court erred in upgrading his motion to suppress evidence because of the evidence was car by police pursuant to a search warrant supported by insufficient evidence. She maintains that affidavit by which the search warrant was issued failed to supply probable cause for the issuance. Therefore, the defendant maintains that the search of his home violated his fourth amendment rights. Facing criminal charges is tough. That’s why you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.

There’s no apparent effect of the face the warrant. He describes the process to be search of the contraband to be sees. There’s no evidence in the record that much who issued the warrant is not attached a neutral. If the evidence is lacking a probable cause, is not selecting in factors a will cause to render it unreasonable. Therefore the court criminal appeals determined that the warrant was valid. When exclusionary rule is a vote reviewing courts may exercise informed discretion in determining the validity of the search. It’s of the search to determine whether the search warrant of this case is in fact based on an integral probable cause. The good faith exception may apply in the case of the search.

If you’ve been charged with domestic assault battery, contact the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. For free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. Spring court declined suppress evidence sees in the execution of a search warrant was issued upon affidavit. And lacked probable cause to be valid. The spring court held that a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule exists. That happens when the arresting officer relies on good faith on the warrant which is later held to be invalid.

In recent case, the court allow the standard. It held that suppression of evidence was not the remedy with warrant was issued by detached magistrate. Also relied upon the good faith of the officer obtain the same. In the case of force, the court criminal appeals cannot see that the officer executed a search warrant was entirely unreasonable. His plea was that the war was supported by probable cause. The court opinion, the officer acted in an objectively reasonable manner relying on the search warrant. Therefore, the court held that the complaint of evidence of was not prohibited by the fourth amendment.

In another case, the prosecution brought the appeal from an order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress. After stopped the defendant for speeding, law enforcement officer discovered marijuana and cocaine in his vehicle. Prosecutors charged the defendant with a misdemeanor possession of marijuana. He filed a motion to suppress the marijuana. He contended discovered in an illegal search. The county court granted the motion suppress. Rather than appeal of the court ruling, assistant just attorney filed a motion to dismiss the prosecution. The court granted this motion. The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has offer will fight hard to get your case dismissed.

Meanwhile, prosecutors charged the defendant with felony possession of cocaine. On the motion suppress cocaine, he argued that the state was part of a collateral estoppel from relitigating the legality of the search. The disc court granted the motion suppress the state argued that the District Court erred in Crane the most suppress the basis of collateral estoppel that’s because the court suppression or was not a final ruling. Collateral stop is embodied in the defendant minutes guarantee against double jeopardy.

Some of the cases that Tulsa sex crimes attorney Stephen Cale handles include, but are not limited to: sexual battery, child molestation, lewd or indecent proposal to a child under 16, lewd acts, indecent exposure, online solicitation, peeping Tom, prostitution, taking clandestine photographs, child sexual abuse, forcible sodomy, enabling child abuse, child neglect, enabling sexual abuse, child endangerment, human trafficking, child stealing, kidnapping, rape, rape by instrumentation, spousal rape, date rape, indecent exposure, procuring lewd exhibition, possession of child pornography, distribution of child pornography, rape by a teacher, and others.