Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa Call For Free Initial Consultation
This content was written for Cale Law Office

With the Cale Law Office, you get aggressive representation to fight your charge. But isn’t that what you’d expect when you hire the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer? For your free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. Attorney Stephen Cale has been practicing for 20 years and dedicates his practice to criminal defense. That’s a huge benefit for his clients. Focus and experience matter when your life is on the line. Attorney Stephen Cale fights hard for his clients because he knows that their life, liberty, future, and reputation are at stake.

Serving clients throughout Oklahoma and Northeastern Oklahoma, including Tulsa County, Jenks, Glenpool, Bixby, Collinsville, Owasso, Sand Springs, Sapulpa, Rogers County, Catoosa, Claremore, Mayes County, Adair, Chouteau, Disney, Grand Lake, Langley, Locust Grove, Pensacola, Salina, Spavinaw, Wagoner County, Coweta, Muskogee County, Webbers Falls, Okmulgee County, Pawnee County, Keystone Lake, Osage County, Pawhuska, Hominy, Nowata County, Coffeyville, Craig County, Vinita, Big Cabin, Washington County, Bartlesville, Copan, and Dewey.

The defendant was charged with sex offenses. He pleaded guilty to these in the trial court gave him a deferred sentence. And placed him on probation for eight years. Later, prosecutors charged the defendant with possession of marijuana methamphetamine. The statement to revoke the defendant’s probation in the first six cases. This is an instance in which the defendant would need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. The trial court found the defendant guilty of the two new cases. It sentenced him to present. On appeal, the defendant raises seven issues.

When the issues is whether not there sufficient evidence to support his revocation. Additionally he wants to know whether not as to new cases were valid. He also these look at the entry of the deadly weapon findings on the two new cases. Further, the defendant argues that the state failed to give him notice of the intent to seek a deadly weapon binding. He also argues that the senses constitute cruel and unusual punishment because he has AIDS. Here’s a summary the facts the case. Defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the decision to revoke his probation. The decision to revoke supervision is not appealable.

The defendant challenge the legal and factual sufficiency to support his convictions and the two new cases. Unfortunately he did not have the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has offer. He was charged with possession of marijuana methamphetamine in determining whether not there sufficient evidence, the appeals court will view the evidence in the light most verbal to the verdict. It will determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. In a factual sufficiency review, the appeals court will view the evidence in a neutral light.

Question asked is whether the jury wasn’t rationally justified in finding guilt be unoriginal doubt. Was of the case on the factual sufficiency challenge, the must be some objective basis in the record. There is great weight given to the facts of the case. It will be reviewed to permit and substitute its judgment for the jury’s when considering the credibility. The appeals court also will not waive the evidence and give it some conclusions.

Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa | Try Me

On April 19, five officers went to the house to investigate the complainant drugs been sold there. The officer stood in the porch and knocked on it. Look to the window and saw that living room coffee table. It had a crack pipe and what appeared to be methamphetamine setting up. The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has offer would fight hard to believe that an officer can determine drugs based on looking through a window.

As officers to the porch, a young woman open the door. Through the open door, the officer saw the defendant leave the back bedroom and come to the door. Officers asked the arm the house for permission to search it. She signed a written form giving her consent to search the house for drugs. Officers found methamphetamine under the sink in the bathroom next to the back bedroom.

The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has offer will tell you to never consent to search of your house, car, or person. Force the police to get a search warrant that they need to. You cannot help yourself by consenting to a search. In fact, refusing to give consent to search may help you in your case. The police may conduct an illegal search. If that happens, you the opportunity to get any evidence that they collect thrown out. For aggressive and experienced representation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800.

The back bedroom, found marijuana in plain view on the floor. There’s also skill Apache materials. It appeared to the officers that someone was paging the marijuana when they arrived. The officers found to firearms the closet in the back bedroom. The officers also found the defense clothing in a briefcase the house. We officers mentioned that they might look for the Prince of the bags containing a marijuana better.

The defendant told the officer his fear Prince by because of the bags as he admitted them. The defendant also told the officers that he was staying at the house as a guest. The officer satisfy the defendant told him he did not live in thereby receive mail there. Officers also testified that the defendant and told him that she overheard the defendant talking on the phone about being out of money. The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer will seek to get evidence thrown out your case. This will seriously undermine the prosecution’s case. In all likelihood of the case will be dismissed.

The defendant testified he was released from jail on March 6 pulling his arrest for other drug offense. The defendant had all his possessions his car. As the of the month, the defendant’s ex-girlfriend uses. He did take the fence car. It still contained all of his possessions.