Best Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa | True Defender
This content was written for Cale Law Office
Are you facing a charge of online solicitation of a minor? Then you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. For aggressive and skilled representation, call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. Schedule your free initial consultation with attorney Stephen Cale. Attorney Cale has been practicing for 20 years. Plus he has the right kind of experience for your case because he dedicates his practice to criminal defense.
A jury convicted the defendant of criminal online solicitation of a minor. It assessed punishment 30 years in prison. The defendant appealed asserting that there was a lack of cooperating evidence and that the evidence was insufficient. Here’s a summary the facts of the case viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.
A teen and her sister were staying overnight with her aunt. Also present with enhanced two children, female was 13 years old and a male age 3. During the night, then returned home with the defendant, who was her boyfriend. The and probably went to bed because she had to work the next morning. The defendant remained in the living room where one the teens and her female cousin Layla pullout couch. The cousin was also present.
And asked her if she had seen pornographic video. Even doing this is a serious offense. It can be used as evidence of online solicitation of a minor. If you’ve been charged with this or any other sex-related crime, you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. Attorney Stephen Cale is a skilled and aggressive criminal lawyer. He will get started on your case right away. Give him a call at 918-277-4800 to schedule your free initial consultation.
When the girl respond that she had not seen that type of video, he began describing content. The talk to possibly watching a movie in defendant offered her five dollars to rub the shoulders. She agreed. After a few minutes, defendant again inappropriately touching the girl. She asked him to stop. He then walked toward an unoccupied bedroom and asked the girl if she wanted to earn $50. This in itself to not amount to online solicitation of a minor.
She asked what was required, he responded just come in the room. The girl instead the defendant would have sexual intercourse with her. She refused to the defendant returned to the couch beside her. He placed her hand on his penis and began rubbing. He also rubbed her breast. When he asked if she wanted him to stop, she responded she did. The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer will conduct a thorough examination of the prosecution’s witness. This will undermine the witness credibility.
The defendant left for the answer bedroom. The growing crying on the couch beside her sister. The following morning, the girl told her sister of the events. The sister telephoned the police investigation followed. This led to the defendant’s arrest. A sexual assault nurse examiner testified to the dissemination of the girl. The history the team gave the nurse substantially paralleled her in court testimony.
Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa | True Defender
The nurse cover the one similar laceration on the teen sexual organ. She said this was consistent with a history of girl provided. On cross-examination, she also agreed there will lawful explanations for the type of laceration the girl presented. No evidence of any other identified explanations was adduced. The sister testified that a sleeping on a pullout couch but overheard a conversation between a man and her sister. She heard the man ask her sister to make $50 and she said what do I have to do. He said that he want her to let her back. He also asked her to come into the room.
This type of conduct if done through the Internet would amount to online solicitation of a minor. Anyone charged with this type of crime needs the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. If you want somebody who will aggressively represent you, call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. Attorney Stephen Cale will develop a free defense strategy plan document during your meeting with him. Attorney Cale’s a highly rated and skilled criminal lawyer.
According to the sister, the girl told the man she was 13 the soon to be 14. After the man went somewhere, the girl lay on the couch crime. The following morning, Kroll told her sister what happened in the sister call the police. After his arrest, the defendant telephoned his mother from jail. The call was recorded in the recording was played for the jury. During the conversation, the defendant stated I did off the girls the money to have sex commit to that. He also offer the girls the money.
The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has offer will tell you to never talk to anyone about allegations made against you. This is true about phone conversations from jail. Phone conversations from jail are always recorded. They can be used against you in court. Used also never talk to police. Police want you to talk to them so they can build a case against you. Talking to the police cannot help you. It can only hurt you, especially if you are accused of online solicitation of a minor.
The defendant chose to testify at the trial. His testimony was rambling and at times difficult to follow. He did not deny however, the offer of sex for money recounted in the jail telephone call with his mother. The defendant argues that the evidence of solicitation in his intent that the teen act on the online solicitation of a minor was in sufficiently corroborated. However, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals disagreed.
The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer will tell you that evidence offered and corroboration need only tend to connect the defendant to the offense. That means contributes in some degree to have a more or less direct bearing. Although the mere presence of an accused in the company of an accomplice is not sufficient. The teens testimony along with that of the nurse in the jail phone conversation was sufficient for online solicitation of a minor.
The jury was not required to accept the defendants initial denial that he committed online solicitation of a minor. The jury was free to accept or reject all or any portion of the witnesses testimony. A jury is a judge of the credibility the witnesses and the weight given to the testimony.