Medical Marijuana Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa
This content was written for Cale Law Office

Have you been charged with a crime related to medical marijuana? Then you need the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. For a free initial consultation, call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. Attorney Stephen Cale has been practicing for 20 years. Plus, he’s the right kind of attorney for your case because he dedicates his practice to criminal defense. Attorney Stephen Cale is a member of the national legal committee for the national organization for the Reform of marijuana laws. He is a dedicated and experienced Tulsa medical marijuana attorney.

Serving clients throughout Oklahoma and Northeastern Oklahoma, including Tulsa County, Jenks, Glenpool, Bixby, Collinsville, Owasso, Sand Springs, Sapulpa, Rogers County, Catoosa, Claremore, Mayes County, Adair, Chouteau, Disney, Grand Lake, Langley, Locust Grove, Pensacola, Salina, Spavinaw, Wagoner County, Coweta, Muskogee County, Webbers Falls, Okmulgee County, Pawnee County, Keystone Lake, Osage County, Pawhuska, Hominy, Nowata County, Coffeyville, Craig County, Vinita, Big Cabin, Washington County, Bartlesville, Copan, and Dewey.

The appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of firearm. He contends that the evidence found in his car should been suppressed because he was unlawfully seized. He also contends officers admitted material information from the evidence that supported the search warrant. Most important, he contends that his position of a medical marijuana authorization card is a factor should be disclosed the officer applied for search warrant. A medical marijuana authorization card is not decay probable cause. Hire the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.

In June, the defendant parked his car in the parking lot of the building. His two companions parked their car next to his. Located in the second floor the building was a drug test force office. The detective assigned to the test force on the two cars at in three men in the parking lot. He does the cars were not installs and were parked next to the road. This unusual placing through the detective’s attention. Has because the cars were flashing vehicles, sitting there that they were showing off. That was an idiotic statement by the detective.

The detective practice when the men for making contact in previous crime investigations. The recognizable man was not the defendant. His binoculars, the detective knows that one of the men with the defendant was clutching the waistband of his baggy pants. Based on the detectives experience without a great game contacts, this indicated that the person was caring a weapon. The detective then observed the defendant in her his car for short time, and get out, and had another individual something very small. The detective cannot see the item that believed it was something small like appeal. If you’re facing medical marijuana charges, hire the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. For free initial consultation, call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800.

In the past, the detective observed about 500 to 1000 drug transactions while working on a task force. Based on his training and expense, the detective suspected that he witnessed a drug transaction. Because the detective was undercover, he requested that the criminal apprehension team make contact with the three individuals. Another detective at least five other officers arrived at the parking lot. The officers a measly detained, patted down, and handcuffed all three individuals. Get the best Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa has for your Medical Marijuana defense.

Meanwhile, when the detectives advised the defendant of his Miranda rights. The defendant told the detective that he had a medical marijuana in his position and he had a medical marijuana authorization card. The defendant gave permission to search the pastor compartment his car. The detective declined to the offer to search because the detective had already began the search were process. Another detective did not tell his partner of the defendant statements. To support a search warrant, the detective advised magistrate of his credentials reported that another officer observed a hand-to-hand exchange between the two of the men.

The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer will tell you to never consent to search of your person or your vehicle. Also never talk to police. Talking to the police cannot help you. It will only hurt you. For free initial consultation, call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. Speak with attorney Stephen Cale. Attorney Stephen Cale has been practicing for 20 years. He dedicates his practice to criminal defense. The detective also presented his own training experience in the detective marijuana and reporting the marijuana undercover from the car. The detective requested permission to search the defense car and sees any marijuana or drug paraphernalia. The magistrate authorize the search warrant to the detective.

Officers found two bags of marijuana, burned marijuana cigarette, and the defense medical marijuana authorization card. Inside the trunk of the defense car, officers found a loaded gun. Police headquarters and for detectives that the defendant was convicted felon. Prosecutors charged the defendant with unlawful possession of a firearm. The defendant appealed, asserting that the trial court should have suppressed evidence found in his car is fruit of an unlawful search and seizure.

Contends that the initial interaction with police unlawfully exceeded the scope of the Terry stop. He also contends that the officers recklessly and intentionally omitted information from the affidavit that was material to a finding of probable cause. When reviewing the denial of the suppression motion, the appellate court will determine whether substantial evidence supports the child’s findings of fact. Additionally, it will decide whether the findings support the conclusions of law. Evidence is substantial defendant persuaded the Fairmont a person of the truth of the stated premise. Conclusions of law and related to the suppression of evidence are reviewed de novo. It’s in times like these that you need to hire the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.

Further, the question of whether investigatory stop is constitutional is a question of law review de novo. Additionally, whether a warrantless seizure is proper is a question of law. Under the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution warrantless searches and seizures are per se unreasonable. Evidence obtained in violation of these constitutional provisions must be suppressed. The evidence obtained as a result of the subsequent search must also be suppressed as fruit of the poisonous tree. Consider the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.