Medical Marijuana Case Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa
This content was written for Cale Law Office
With Tulsa criminal defense attorney Stephen Cale, you get aggressive representation to fight your medical marijuana-related charge. But isn’t that what you’d expect when looking for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer? For your free initial consultation, call the Cale Law Office at 918-277-4800. Attorney Cale has been practicing for 20 years and dedicates his practice to criminal defense. That’s a huge benefit for his clients. Focus and experience matter when your life is on the line. Attorney Stephen Cale fights hard for his clients because he knows that their life, liberty, future, and reputation are at stake.
Serving clients throughout Oklahoma and Northeastern Oklahoma, including Tulsa County, Jenks, Glenpool, Bixby, Collinsville, Owasso, Sand Springs, Sapulpa, Rogers County, Catoosa, Claremore, Mayes County, Adair, Chouteau, Disney, Grand Lake, Langley, Locust Grove, Pensacola, Salina, Spavinaw, Wagoner County, Coweta, Muskogee County, Webbers Falls, Okmulgee County, Pawnee County, Keystone Lake, Osage County, Pawhuska, Hominy, Nowata County, Coffeyville, Craig County, Vinita, Big Cabin, Washington County, Bartlesville, Copan, and Dewey.
In the Washington case, the trial court found the defendant guilty of unlawful manufacture marijuana and unlawful possession of marijuana with intent to deliver. This was after a bench trial stipulated facts. The defendant appealed, arguing that the trial court erred in denying the opportunity present an affirmative defense. The fence was that he was a designated provider under the Washington state medical use of marijuana act. The appeals court agreed and reversed the judge. Here’s a summary the facts the case. In office, Sheriff’s deputies contacted the defendant’s residence. Hire the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer.
They received a tip that the defendant was selling marijuana. The defendant admitted that he was a designated provider of medical marijuana. He said that he grew possess marijuana. The state charged him with unlawful possession of a controlled substance, marijuana. The adult intent to deliver and then lawful manufacture of controlled substance, marijuana. In a pretrial hearing, the deputy testified that the defendant admitted that he was a medical or one provider for three different people. The defendant provide the deputy documentation to support his claim
Medical marijuana prescriptions and signed forms designated the defendant as a designated provider for two people. The best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has offer will tell you that you cannot trust law enforcement to do the right thing. Defendant also produced for the deputy of medical marijuana prescription for another person does not a designated provider form. The defendant argued that a material issue of fact existed regarding whether provided marijuana to more than one person at a time. The trial court found that the defendant admitted that he is a designated provider to three people. Also found that as a matter of law, the defendant was a designated provider for more than one person at a time.
The trial court reduction the defense argument that any one time meant that Brown had provided marijuana to more than one person at the same point in time. The trial court found that the defendant failed to present a prima facie case they complied with the medical marijuana statute. As consequence, the court denied the defendant the opportunity to present defense to the jury. Call the best Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa has to offer.
Defendant for a new trial, arguing that he was not a designated provider to one man because that man cannot testified that he had never received marijuana from the defendant. Also contended that whether provided marijuana for the woman was a factual question for the jury. That’s because he did not provide officers with a designated provider form. The trial court denied his motion for reconsideration. After stipulated facts from the bench trial, the trial court found that the defendant was guilty of unlawful possession of controlled substance, marijuana. The defendant appealed.
If you need to appeal your medical marijuana case, look for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. Call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800 to schedule your free initial consultation with attorney Stephen Cale. Attorney Stephen Cale is on the national legal committee for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. He’s an aggressive and experienced Tulsa medical marijuana attorney. Attorney Cale understands that your life, liberty, future, and reputation are at stake.
On appeal, the defendant asserted that the trial court erred in denying him the right to present the medical marijuana affirmative defense at trial. He argues that because the statute is ambiguous, the appeals court must resolve the ambiguity in his favor. Additionally, he asserts that the factual action issues exist. The appeals court agreed with the defendant that factual issues exist regarding whether the defendant was a designated provider to only one patient at a time. Provider the person who is 18 years old or older. This also been designated in writing by patient to serve as a designated provider under the law. This is in the state of Washington.
Disagreed providers prohibited from consuming marijuana obtained from the personal, medical use of the patient for whom the individual is acting as a designated provider. The provider must serve only one patient at any one time. The 2007 statute provides an affirmative defense for Disney providers against was to criminal marijuana laws. If you’re facing allegations concerning medical marijuana, hire the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has offer. In 2011, the state legislature amended the statute. Was to courts dispute are retroactive application of the statute. But may apply in amendment retroactively if the legislature intended to do so. They also apply retroactively if the admin is curative the girl Pfizer technically corrects ambiguous statutory language.
At the hearing to determine whether defendant may raise the medical marijuana a defense, you need only make a prima facie case to raise the defense. Although the defendant must show by preponderance of the evidence that he is entitled to the defense, the trial court must take evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant. Trial courts may weigh issues of law when determining whether to permit the defendant duration medical marijuana affirmative defense. If you’re facing a charge related to medical marijuana, look for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer. For free initial consultation, call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800.