Criminal Defense Attorney Tulsa | Marijuana Charge Lawyer | Cale Law Office
Ths content was written for Cale Law Office
Are you searching for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer? Then you need to call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. Schedule your free initial consultation with attorney Stephen Cale. Attorney Stephen Cale focuses his practice on criminal defense. That means he has the right kind of experience.
A jury convicted the defendant of 16 drug-related crimes. The district court sentenced him to life in prison. The defendant appealed. Here’s a summary the case. Law enforcement authorities obtained information suggesting that members of the gang were manufacturing distribute cocaine in Tulsa. Various agencies listed the investigation into the gang’s activities. The investigation led to charges of conspiracy to possess cocaine in its intent to distribute cocaine. They also result in a charge of conspiracy to launder drug trafficking proceeds.
The evidence at trial was compelling. Three former gang members testified that the defendant remembers of the gang. Travel records and photographs show that these men were connected to one another. The defendant’s mother testified that she assumed her son sold drugs for a living. Two witnesses reported seeing the defendant with cocaine in a hotel room near the Promenade Paul. The defendant had been arrested twice and houses were law enforcement discovered large amounts of cocaine.
The first of these arrested place in July during a consensual search of another person’s home. At the time the search, the defendant was standing just inside the closed door of a person’s bedroom. The ulcer who search the bedroom found two guns and a reclining chair and ammunition the shoebox in the closet. The officer also found $1500 in cash, three baggies containing cocaine base in a baggie of cocaine powder. Somebody else claimed responsibility for the guns and drugs found in this room.
However, recorded gel cause, the defendant planted the drugs were his. Told his mother that his friend took responsibility but it really had. This first arrest led to the defendant’s conviction for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute. The second of the defendants arrested place in November in the house in Jenks. Officers got an arrest warrant for the defendant and received information that he had threatened to shoot one of the informants.
One of the highly rated criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer says that you should never talk to police. Attorney Stephen Cale has been practicing for nearly two decades. Attorney Cale says that talking to law enforcement cannot help you. It can only hurt you. Police will use deception to try to trip you up. They are looking to arrest someone, not to free somebody.
Based on this threat, law enforcement obtained a court order authorizing a cell phone carrier together data from defendant cell phone. It asked the carrier to ping the cell phone and determine its location. The cell phone carrier did so in that led law enforcement to the house. We officers arrived, the individuals in the house initially barricade themselves inside. After about an hour, the defendant came out and surrendered peacefully. The officers then entered the house and conducted a protective sweep. They were looking for one of the defendant’s co-conspirators.
The co-conspirator wasn’t there. But during this week, the officer saw variety of evidence in plain view. These events led to the defense convictions for possessing of cocaine with intent to distribute. As to the money laundering charges, trial testimony establish that the defendant often as his girlfriend’s mother to buy money orders or make deposits with cash that he gave them. For example, a witness testified that banks gave her thousands of dollars in cash and asked her to buy money orders and send them to California. He also asked to deposit money to specific bank accounts.
If you’re looking for the best criminal defense attorney Tulsa has to offer, then you need an aggressive one like Stephen Cale. Call the Cale law office at 918-277-4800. Schedule your free initial consultation. Attorney Cale will also develop a free defense strategy plan document to take with you. This will outline the procedures of the case.
The witness also testified that she made at least forecast deposits into a particular bank account of the defendant’s direction. The defendant’s mother testified that she bought for money orders at her sense direction to send the California. She said that another guy coming her to the post office to buy the money orders. The defendant appealed, challenging his convictions and his sentence.
Defendant first argued that the district courts of suppress evidence found at the Jenks house after a second arrest. He argued that the state issued his arrest without probable cause. Secondly, he said that the state court issued the ping order without probable cause. And lastly, he argued that law enforcement performed unjustified protective sweep the house after arresting him. The appellate court reviews the district court’s factual findings on suppression motions for clear error, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution. It will review de novo the district court’s ultimate determination whether probable cause supported a search or seizure.
An arrest one must be supported by probable cause to comply with the fourth amendment, said criminal defense attorney Tulsa Stephen Cale. Recorded terms of probable cause exists, the reviewing court’s task is merely to ensure the prosecution’s affidavit provided a substantial basis for reaching that conclusion. In this case, the detective with the Tulsa Police Department as state court issue of an arrest warrant for the defendant on charges of conspiring to commit aggravated drug trafficking. He also wants a warrant for conspiring to commit aggravated manufacturing and trafficking cocaine.
The detective’s affidavit provided an overview of the investigation and identified one person is a leader of the gang. He also related the gang’s drug trafficking organization. Three confidential forms provided consistent reports about drug trafficking. Two of them identify the defendant is a member just underneath another person in that organization. The detective’s affidavit also included details about the defendant’s arrest, including the threatening call.